I suspect that monolothic disk intensive apps, such as Filemaker Pro, are best left to HFS+ for the time being. And it will take time for Apple to both identify and iron out what will be inevitable technical hiccups.ĪPFS is a very sophisticated file system that must track far more than does HFS+. ![]() Presently developers have little experience and almost no technical documentation to go with. Thus I have transitioned back to HFS+ for the time being, with not one hiccup.įor the uninitiated, the transition to an altogether new file system (APFS) is a very big deal technically. And, ultimately, the disk is not useable - the 1TB SSD must be reformatted from scratch. This invariable crashes the app, macOS High Sierra. I have repeated crashes under APFS but not HFS+ when compacting a large database (>5GB). Please note, I have found Filemaker Pro 16.x does not presently mix well with APFS. Note: The price is based off of a yearly subscription.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |